Electrifying with a tight grid connection: lessons from three companies
By Maarten Alta · 18 October 2026
Can a transport company switch to electric trucks when its grid connection is tight? For three very different companies the answer was yes, without overhauling their trip planning. But the route there differed a lot.
I was part of the team that calculated, with a different modelling tool, what fitted on their connections. Below are the main outcomes and what I learned from them.
The three companies
| Company 1 | Company 2 | Company 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Question | Avoid exceeding the contracted capacity and absorb 10–15% growth | Phased switch from 59 diesel trucks to electric | Phased switch to electric rigid trucks |
| Contracted capacity | 462 kW | 67 kW (two buildings) | 176 kW |
| Electricity use per year | approx. 1,400 MWh | approx. 200 MWh | approx. 390 MWh |
| Solar power per year | approx. 500 MWh | approx. 335 MWh, more than its own use | none |
| Room for charging at the start | sufficient, but peaks from uncontrolled charging | one truck | two rigid trucks |
| Outcome | Smart charging solves the peaks; growth and two e-trucks fit | With a battery, five e-trucks fit; fully electric needs a 1.5 MW connection | With solar panels and a small battery, four rigid trucks fit |
For all three we assumed 20 cents per kWh for purchase, 6 cents for feed-in and 5.5 cents for own solar power.
Lesson 1: the first gain is often in charging behaviour, not hardware
At company 1, peaks arose because cars were charged at full power straight away, and often further than agreed with the customer. Smart chargers that share the available power, plus new work instructions, were enough to stay within the connection. Even with the expected growth and two electric trucks added.
A battery of over 125,000 euros did increase the self-consumption of solar power here, but made electricity more expensive overall. So that investment did not make sense.
Lesson 2: solar lowers the price, a battery buys room
We saw the same pattern in all three:
- Solar panels lower the average price per kWh. At company 3 it fell from 20 to almost 17 cents with an installation of around 126,000 euros.
- A battery makes the price per kWh slightly higher, but creates room for extra trucks. At company 2 it went from one to five e-trucks on the same connection, at about 3 cents per kWh extra.
So the question is not "does a battery pay off?" but "what is an extra electric truck worth to me, if a grid upgrade is impossible or years away?"
Lesson 3: sun by day, charging by night
Company 2 generated more solar power than it used, but its trucks charged between 7 pm and 5 am. Without storage, most of that power went to the grid for 6 cents. With a battery, direct self-consumption rose from about 30% to over 60%.
So always look at when power is generated and when you charge.
Lesson 4: look at all consumers on site
At company 3, the peaks were not caused by trucks, but by charging internal transport such as forklifts. If you only look at the trucks, you miss half the story.
Lesson 5: start small and scale up
Company 3 could start with one electric rigid truck that tops up during the day. With solar panels, two fit. Four trucks without daytime charging is also possible, with a 200 kWh battery (about 50,000 euros) to absorb the peaks. With an average trip of around 300 km, that is a realistic growth path: gain experience first, then scale up.
Lesson 6: ownership of the building matters
Company 2 rented its building. That makes an investment in solar panels, a battery or a bigger connection a conversation with the landlord. Take that into account early.
Lesson 7: the planning did not have to change
Perhaps the most important lesson: in all three cases, trip planning could largely stay as it was. But charging times, charging power and agreements at the depot had to be organised more smartly. That is exactly where planners play a key role.
Why I now calculate per quarter-hour
These calculations were done per hour. Grid operators, however, look at your peak per quarter-hour, and a short peak can stay hidden within an hour. That is why the Energy Scan calculates per quarter-hour, over a full year, with costs up to ten years ahead next to diesel.
Want to know what fits on your connection? Request an Energy Scan or start with a Quick Scan.
Read also: How many electric trucks fit on your grid connection? and Charging credits in Europe